Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Logic of Probabilistic Arguments
1 CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract We present a logic for reasoning with probabilistic arguments to help decision making under uncertainty. The syntax of the logic is essentially modal propositional, and arguments of decision makers are expressed as sentences of the logic, with associated supports drawn from a probability dictionary. To aggregate a set of arguments for...
متن کاملDiagonal arguments and fixed points
A universal schema for diagonalization was popularized by N.S. Yanofsky (2003), based on a pioneering work of F.W. Lawvere (1969), in which the existence of a (diagonolized-out and contradictory) object implies the existence of a fixed-point for a certain function. It was shown that many self-referential paradoxes and diagonally proved theorems can fit in that schema. Here, we fi...
متن کاملVisualising a Logic of Dependability Arguments
This paper offers general guidelines for the development of effective visual languages. That is, languages for constructing diagrams that can be easily and readily interpreted and manipulated by the human reader. We use these guidelines first to examine classical AND/OR trees as a representation of logical proofs, and second to design and evaluate a visual language for representing proofs in Lo...
متن کاملA logic-based theory of deductive arguments
We explore a framework for argumentation (based on classical logic) in which an argument is a pair where the first item in the pair is a minimal consistent set of formulae that proves the second item (which is a formula). We provide some basic definitions for arguments, and various kinds of counter-arguments (defeaters). This leads us to the definition of canonical undercuts which we argue are ...
متن کاملReal Arguments Are Approximate Arguments
There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate a formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting arguments. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair 〈Φ, α〉 where Φ is minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. However, real argument...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2293-734X,0824-2577
DOI: 10.22329/il.v38i3.4954